Partially AI-ready — meaningful gaps in citability, schema and entity signals.
Strong baseline SEO. Critical work needed before pages can be reliably extracted and cited by AI engines.
A professional GEO + AEO audit showing how your pages perform across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Bing Copilot, and Google AI Overviews — with scores, problems, priorities, and step-by-step implementation guidance.
Strong baseline SEO. Critical work needed before pages can be reliably extracted and cited by AI engines.
Enter a page URL and get a short AI visibility preview with estimated scores for ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Bing Copilot. The result shows your starting point and explains what the full audit unlocks.
Your website may rank on Google and still be invisible, untrusted, or weakly cited by AI engines. They don't just rank pages — they select, summarize, and recommend sources. The rules for being chosen are different.
Content humans understand can still be unreadable to retrieval systems — structure, semantics, and section boundaries matter.
Without atomic, attributable, source-bearing passages, AI engines won't quote you. They'll quote someone else.
Organization, Product, FAQPage, Person and other schema gaps make your page harder to index, classify and reference.
Without Wikidata, knowledge graph alignment, and entity signals, AI engines can't connect your name to your topic.
Modern AI crawlers (GPTBot, Google-Extended, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, etc.) need to be reviewed explicitly.
Missing authorship, weak reviewers, no dates, contradictory facts — and AI engines de-prioritize your page.
Client-rendered content is often skipped. If it's not visible in the initial HTML, it may not count.
Conflicting dates, vague authorship, missing structured data — AI engines reach for a cleaner alternative.
Ten layered checks across visibility, structure, trust, and citability — each scored, prioritized, and paired with a recommended fix.
Where you stand today across the major AI answer engines, with a weighted overall readiness score.
Where your content fails to translate into clean, extractable answer-engine output.
Authorship, reviewers, citations, dates, sources, contradictions, YMYL readiness.
robots.txt, llms.txt, IndexNow, JS rendering, crawl path, server signals for AI bots.
FAQPage, Organization, Product, Person, MedicalDevice and the gaps that block classification.
Block-level scoring of which passages are likely to be quoted — and which are too weak to be picked up.
Wikidata, Wikipedia, Reddit, YouTube, GBP, and the entity-building work to align your brand with its topic.
Each problem is paired with a concrete, implementable fix — not vague suggestions.
What to fix first, second, third — ranked by impact, urgency, and effort.
This report explains what needs to be fixed, why it matters, how urgent it is, and what to do first — with implementation guidance, ready-to-use suggestions, and a post-implementation score projection where relevant.
Most audits tell you what is broken. This report tells you what is broken, why it matters, and exactly what to do next.
See Packages →Each report is built like a strategic deliverable — scoring, diagnosis, platform-specific findings, exact recommendations, and a practical execution plan.
A complete review of your page's readiness to be found, trusted, and cited across AI engines, including engine alignment, technical access, schema, entity signals, and citability.
| Area | Status | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| FAQPage schema | Missing | High |
| Organization schema | Incomplete | High |
| llms.txt | Not present | Medium |
| Author / reviewer | Weak | High (YMYL) |
| JS-rendered content | Partial | Medium |
| Wikidata entity | Not linked | High |
| Citability of key blocks | Strong | — |
| robots.txt for AI bots | Outdated | Medium |
/llms.txt at root. Declare canonical sources, brand entity, and licensing posture to LLMs.HighClick through the four most important sections of a typical report — cover with overall score, the quick assessment table, the AI crawler access map, and the prioritized action plan.
Each paid report includes findings, solutions, priorities, and step-by-step implementation guidance — not just a list of problems.
Best for testing one important page — money page, product page, or service page.
Best for businesses auditing their most important pages first.
Best for agencies, ecommerce sites, content-heavy properties, and larger improvement plans.
Best for agencies, large websites, ecommerce catalogs, or ongoing audit work.
Every report is a structured, multi-section document covering visibility, technical access, structure, trust, content, and execution.
This report is most valuable for buyers whose trust, content clarity, and organic visibility directly affect the bottom line.
White-label friendly diagnostics for your client work and pitches.
Product, category, and review pages prepared for AI buying journeys.
Citation-ready content where AI engines recommend at the decision moment.
Comparison, alternatives and integration pages tuned for AI answers.
Medical, finance, legal — where authorship, reviewers and trust are non-negotiable.
Strong organic competitors? Get the structural advantage AI engines reward.
Make sure your editorial output is being chosen, summarized, and cited.
You're already paying for visibility. Extend it into AI search before competitors do.
AI engines don't only rank pages. They select, summarize, cite, and recommend sources. To appear in AI-generated answers, a page needs more than keywords — it needs structure, factual content, entity recognition, technical accessibility, schema, trust signals, freshness, and citation-ready language.
The websites that win the next decade aren't the ones with the most pages. They're the ones built to be understood and cited.
AI engines pick a small set of sources to cite. Either you're in that set, or you aren't.
The brands AI engines understand as entities get cited far more often than the ones they don't.
Citations happen at the block level. Your strongest passage is more important than your strongest page.
You don't need to audit your entire site to get value. Start with the pages where AI visibility most directly affects revenue, trust, or lead flow.
A clean, predictable process. After payment, an invoice is issued automatically and you send the page URL or URL list for review.
Single page, 5-page, 10-page, or a custom 11+ engagement.
Share the URLs you want audited and any context that helps.
Each page is reviewed against the full audit framework.
Scores, findings, solutions, priorities and exact next steps.
Invoice is issued for every order. Delivery time depends on the number of pages and project scope. If a page is blocked, login-only, or technically inaccessible, we will contact you before completing the audit.
The report is structured so SEO, developers, content, and leadership can each find exactly what they need.
Built for GEO, AEO, SEO, AI visibility, content structure, schema, technical accessibility, and trust infrastructure.
A structured audit framework for serious SEO, content, technical, affiliate, ecommerce, comparison, and YMYL visibility work — combining GEO, AEO, technical access, entity signals, trust infrastructure, and practical implementation into one client-ready report.
Every finding ends in a fix. Every fix has a priority. Every priority has an owner. The point isn't more diagnostics — it's better outcomes.
Tell us about your site, your priorities, and the number of pages you'd like audited. For 11+ pages we'll come back with a custom quote.
Order a professional GEO + AEO report and get a clear view of what is helping, what is blocking visibility, and what should be fixed first.